Facebook attacks gov't web-monitoring plans

From ZDNet.co.uk:

Social-networking site Facebook has criticised government suggestions that intelligence services should monitor the web communications of all UK citizens.

Facebook chief privacy officer and head of global public policy Chris Kelly told ZDNet UK on Tuesday that the government proposals, which include monitoring social-networking sites, were excessive.

"We think monitoring all user traffic is overkill," Kelly said. "There is legislation to allow law enforcement access to traffic data [of suspects]. We are not convinced at this time that expansion of those channels is necessary."

Kelly was responding to a speech made by Home Office security minister Vernon Coaker on 18 March at a meeting of the House of Commons Fourth Delegated Legislation Committee. Coaker said the EU Data Retention Directive, which requires internet service providers to retain traffic data for at least 12 months, did not go far enough, as the directive did not apply to social-networking providers.

Coaker said the government was considering retaining traffic data for all instant messaging and communications on social-networking sites, including Facebook, MySpace, and Bebo, as part of its Intercept Modernisation Programme (IMP).

The IMP, a proposed overhaul of intelligence service systems, has two strands. First, the government would use deep packet inspection to monitor and record the traffic data of all UK internet communications and telecommunications, including instant messaging and VoIP. The second strand of IMP is to store that data in a centralised government database.

Kelly said if the government monitors social-networking users, Facebook's business could suffer, as people might dislike the privacy implications of their internet and social-networking traffic data being monitored by the state.

"One of the reasons that Facebook has been so successful is that it provides greater privacy controls than any other [social-networking service] on the internet," Kelly said. "The privacy controls allow people to share information in a comfortable, safe and trusted environment."

Kelly said there was a risk some people may perceive government monitoring as invasive, and so stop using Facebook services. He added that this risk is one of the reasons why police currently only monitor those they suspect of criminality.

"This is one of the reasons that particularisation has been required to get access to that information," Kelly said. "The idea of doing full monitoring of traffic is a boil-the-ocean strategy."

Kelly added that the government suggestions were also impractical from a technical point of view, and may be self-defeating for counter-terrorism efforts.

"There are design and computing-power limitations, and strategic limits on human power to analyse all that information," Kelly said. "That's why [interception] needs to be targeted."

Facebook has not yet lobbied the government over its IMP proposals, but may do so, Kelly said.

"We haven't engaged the government directly at this point," he added. "We are happy to have a conversation with any law-enforcement authority around any activity on Facebook."

Kelly spoke to ZDNet UK at the e-Crime Congress in London on Tuesday.

The Home Office had not responded to a request for comment at the time of writing.



Copyright © Jewish Internet Defense Force
All Rights Reserved

LEGAL:
The views expressed on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of the JIDF. The content is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company or individual. This site's intention is to do no harm, to not injure others, defame, or libel. All data and information provided on this site is for informational, educational, and/or entertainment purposes only. The Jewish Internet Defense Force (JIDF) makes no representations as to accuracy, currentness, correctness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use, or access to this site. We are not responsible for translation or interpretation of content. We are not responsible for defamatory statements bound to government, religious or other laws from the reader’s country of origin. All information is provided on an as-is basis with no warranties, and confers no rights. We are not responsible for the actions, content, accuracy, opinions expressed, privacy policies, products or services or for any damages or losses, directly or indirectly, caused or alleged to have been caused as a result of your use or reliance on such information on the Jewish Internet Defense Force site. This site includes links to other sites and blogs operated by third parties. These links are provided as a convenience to you and as an additional avenue of access to the information contained therein. We have not reviewed all of the information on other sites and are not responsible for the content of any other sites or any products or services that may be offered through other sites. The inclusion of these links in no way indicates their endorsement, support or approval of the contents of this site or the policies or positions of the JIDF. We have the right to edit, remove or deny access to content that is determined to be, in our sole discretion, unacceptable. These Terms and Conditions of Use apply to you when you view, access or otherwise use this blog and the Website. The JIDF is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
Related Posts with Thumbnails