Experts: Virtual battlefield is just as important as real one


August 2008 screencap of Hezbollah Facebook Group with over 118,000 members that Facebook refused to remove, leaving us no option but to remove it ourselves


(Stars and Stripes) WASHINGTON — In the days following the deadly suicide attack on Forward Operating Base Chapman in Afghanistan last month, CIA officials scrambled to figure out who the bomber was and how they could have been deceived.

At the same time, al-Qaida media specialists were making the bomber’s online sermons available for Kindle and the iPhone.

"Al-Qaida has transformed from a terrorist organization that uses media to a media organization that uses terrorism," said Jarret Brachman, former director of West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center. "We think we’ve got it, and so we go to kill and capture these guys. But that’s not their only fight."

Brachman and other counterterrorism scholars say Islamic extremists are fighting — and winning — a propaganda war online, a battle almost completely separate from the fighting in Afghanistan.

But that virtual battlefield is just as important, according to those experts and a growing number of lawmakers looking at the future of the U.S. fight against terrorism.

"The broader battle that is more troubling right now than the operational battle is the long-term message, the battle of ideas," said Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., chairman of the House Armed Services Terrorism and Unconventional Threats subcommittee, at a hearing on the issues last month.

"We are fighting an ideology. When we’re looking at how to stop people from becoming radicalized it is a message war, and right now we are considerably behind in fighting that battle."

Defense officials have already linked two recent domestic terror attacks — the Fort Hood shooting in November and the attempted plane bombing in Detroit on Christmas — to cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, an American-born extremist now living in Yemen.

Law enforcement officials say that in recent years, as the cleric has become more radicalized and more closely aligned with al-Qaida, he’s also become more Internet savvy. Digital copies of his sermons are easily found online. Days after the Fort Hood attack he posted justifications for the violence on his blog.

Christopher Boucek, a new media specialist at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said al-Awlaki isn’t the only one actively building his online profile. In the last five years, researchers have seen a tremendous boost in English-speaking and U.S.-based Web sites espousing extremist Islamic views.

While a small number of those sites are run by legitimate al-Qaida operatives, most are put together by what Brachman calls "jihobbyists" — fans of al-Qaiada who repeat and editorialize on the virtues of radical teachings. While they might not be directly involved in terrorist attacks, they help spread the potentially dangerous ideology to a broader audience.

"The Internet is not a system of radical training camps ... but it spreads participation," Boucek said.

He points to the case of five northern Virgina men arrested in Pakistan last month after trying to contact insurgent groups there. Investigators said the men often researched radical Islamic teachings online and used Facebook to contact a Taliban recruiter in Pakistan.

The problem, experts say, is that no real counter effort exists to combat this easy spread of extremism.  [Guess they haven't heard of the JIDF, yet. -JIDF]

The U.S. military and State Department have formal programs to combat misinformation about battlefield casualties or factual inaccuracies by enemy fighters, but aren’t positioned to counter pseudo-scholarly writings on the merits of al-Qaida’s interpretation of the Quran.

Defense officials say they’ll correct widespread factual inaccuracies and respond directly to charges by key terrorist operatives, but they’re loathe to respond to bloggers or fans simply repeating propoganda, for fear of elevating a malcontent to some higher prestige. But, they said they are watching those conversations online.

Meanwhile, Brachman and Boucek said since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, researchers and think tanks have slowly shifted their focus more toward military intervention topics than general study of extremism and its cause.

"It’s shocking to me that nine years into this protracted conflict there is not an organized way to study this," Boucek said. "If you look back during the Cold War, there was a whole study of communism and Russian and Chinese studies, Maoism. We don’t have that for today."

Brachman, who authored the book "Global Jihadism" and teaches at North Dakota State University, runs his own blog where he collects and refutes common themes from extremist Web sites. He said he knows of only a handful of other Islamic experts in the U.S. doing similar work, although Saudi Arabia and other Middle East nations have similar state-sponsored programs.

 The JIDF relies on your support. Click here to support us.



Copyright © Jewish Internet Defense Force
All Rights Reserved

LEGAL:
The views expressed on this website do not necessarily reflect the views of the JIDF. The content is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company or individual. This site's intention is to do no harm, to not injure others, defame, or libel. All data and information provided on this site is for informational, educational, and/or entertainment purposes only. The Jewish Internet Defense Force (JIDF) makes no representations as to accuracy, currentness, correctness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use, or access to this site. We are not responsible for translation or interpretation of content. We are not responsible for defamatory statements bound to government, religious or other laws from the reader’s country of origin. All information is provided on an as-is basis with no warranties, and confers no rights. We are not responsible for the actions, content, accuracy, opinions expressed, privacy policies, products or services or for any damages or losses, directly or indirectly, caused or alleged to have been caused as a result of your use or reliance on such information on the Jewish Internet Defense Force site. This site includes links to other sites and blogs operated by third parties. These links are provided as a convenience to you and as an additional avenue of access to the information contained therein. We have not reviewed all of the information on other sites and are not responsible for the content of any other sites or any products or services that may be offered through other sites. The inclusion of these links in no way indicates their endorsement, support or approval of the contents of this site or the policies or positions of the JIDF. We have the right to edit, remove or deny access to content that is determined to be, in our sole discretion, unacceptable. These Terms and Conditions of Use apply to you when you view, access or otherwise use this blog and the Website. The JIDF is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com.
Related Posts with Thumbnails